|

|
TOPSPURS
Jim Duggan's TOTTENHAM
HOTSPUR site
|
Refs - Daniel Wynne gives us his take on the current controversy – 23/8/01.
The new Premiership season
is four days old and fourteen games have been played thus far (as at Wednesday
morning when this is written)
Lots of column space and
air time has been given to the subject of referees over the past couple of
years. Many people thought that making the referees become professional would
be the answer. In my mind that is a nonsense as it is the same people in charge
of the games making the same mistakes.
At the start of this piece
I want to make it perfectly clear that I am of the opinion that they all have a
very hard job and it is a role they undertake with genuine honesty. I am not
saying for one minute that they are dishonest and I am sure that they give the
decisions as they see them. That, is where the problems lie.
In the fourteen
Premiership games played so far, we have seen games changed by decisions that
are simply ludicrous. On Saturday., Middlesborough were 1-0 down at home going
into the last five minutes of the game. Arsenal were down to ten men when
Ashley Cole was judged to have been brought down by Ugo Ehiog. The replay
showed that the contact was minimal to say the least and whatever marginal
contact took place was outside the penalty area. The referee however saw it
differently. He awarded a penalty, sent off poor Ugo and 4 mins later the game
was over with Arsenal having won 4-0.
On the same day, Ipswich
conceded a penalty that was not a penalty. It cost them the game as Sunderland
won 1-0.
Monday night’s events at
Goodison Park were simply beyond belief. Doherty did not concede a foul let
alone deserve to have a penalty awarded against him and see Elleray wave a red
card at him. That penalty changed the face of the game.
Elleray also missed a
nasty tackle by Treacle and Everton had a perfectly good goal ruled out. (not
that I am complaining!!)
Last night at Highbury,
Jeff Winter was booking people for fun and sent two Leeds players off.
The game is played by
twenty two athletes in prime physical condition usually between the ages of 18
– 35. The men in black are not as young or fit but they need to be in perfect
positions to spot every single incident.
The refs only have a split
second to make a decision whereas we have had the benefit of the many cameras
the TV companies use and have seen the incidents from many angles and at
different speeds.
It is only natural that
mistakes will be made but the pressures of the modern game, with so much being
at stake, therefore dictates a higher level of consistency and accuracy from
the referees is needed…………….now..
Consistency is a different
point to accuracy but accuracy levels need to be addressed.
It is not possible to
achieve perfection so the referees body need to hold their hands up and admit
they need help. Nobody would criticise them for doing that, in fact most
supporters would praise them. It is time to move on and take the game forward
for the benefit of all involved.
Personally,
I don’t think interruptions for every incident is the answer, but with so much
technology available in the grounds, there must be a quick and simple solution.
As I said, I don’t want to see the game stopped at the drop of the act, and I
don’t have all the answers, but a happy compromise must be easily achieved
before the game is spoiled and the entertainment is reduced to a farce